Just as the oilfield fuels the modern economy, master service agreements (MSAs) fuel the modern oilfield. But while almost every MSA contains indemnity and insurance clauses, experienced oilfield lawyers will advise their clients that no two are identical. Determining how these unique contractual provisions apply to losses and interact with available liability coverage is a nuanced process that frequently results in litigation.
In the last few years, the video game industry has been hit with lawsuits accusing certain games of fostering addictive behaviors, especially among younger players. These lawsuits often cite features like loot boxes, microtransactions, and reward systems, which are designed to enhance player engagement, as in-game mechanisms that push players toward compulsive play and psychological harm. Plaintiffs claim that game developers either knew or should have known about these potential risks and failed to mitigate them.
In the aftermath of two powerful hurricanes the process of assessing the damage and rebuilding begins. Businesses suffered billions of dollars in losses during hurricanes Helene and Milton, both in physical property damage and disruption of their business (i.e., lost profits). That is precisely why businesses purchase property and other commercial insurance—to indemnify them when disaster strikes. However, it is not uncommon for businesses to be unpleasantly surprised when they present a claim to discover that their insurers are unwilling to stand behind the full insurance coverage they promised. This is particularly so in the case of a substantial loss, and even more so in the aftermath of a wide-area catastrophe—such as a hurricane or other natural disaster—because such catastrophes have negative repercussions on insurers given the number of impacted policyholders.
This article highlights eight property adjustment and coverage issues. Understanding and being thoughtful about these issues now, including working with coverage counsel as appropriate, is critical to maximizing insurance recovery.
Hurricane Helene struck Florida’s Big Bend region as a category 4 hurricane on September 25, 2024, and continued to move northeast. The storm caused widespread power outages and catastrophic damage across Florida, the Carolinas, Tennessee, Georgia and other states. It has brought life-threatening storm surges in its aftermath. Now, less than two weeks later, Hurricane Milton is making its way toward Florida’s western coast and threatens to cause additional catastrophic damage.
The below checklist includes essential considerations and steps to take for property owners and businesses that stand to be affected by hurricanes.
A recent decision by a California appellate court in Practice Fusion, Inc. v. Freedom Specialty Insurance Company, denying the policyholder more than $118 million in Directors & Officers liability coverage based on an expansive professional services exclusion, is a sobering reminder that this nettlesome exclusion—when over-broadly applied, as was the case here—may render your D&O coverage worthless. The mere fact that Practice Fusion’s insurers asserted this exclusion in the circumstances of this claim should remind brokers and risk managers of the importance of eliminating, or at least narrowing, professional services exclusions where there is any potential argument that the insured is engaged in providing any form of “professional services.” Although it is of course appropriate to fill any gaps created by the exclusion with commensurate Errors & Omissions coverage, E&O policies do not provide the same scope of coverage, or even limits, that are available under D&O policies.
In what was likely a shock to coal-fired electric utilities, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held on June 28, 2024, that proposed decisions by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in January 2022—prohibiting coal-fired power plants from closing coal ash impoundments where coal ash is in contact with groundwater—were a “straightforward application” of a previously promulgated agency rule. In Electric Energy, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, the appeals court validated EPA’s actions as a proper exercise of authority. This ruling ends (at least for now) a regulatory odyssey that began in 2015.
When is a claim “brought” against an insured?
A Delaware bankruptcy court’s answer to this seemingly innocuous question turned into a nightmare for the estate of a bankrupt insured. The insured was deprived of coverage under a claims-made D&O policy for a claim filed three years after the retroactive date of the policy, on the basis that the claim arose from the same facts as an earlier False Claims Act suit that was filed before the policy’s retroactive date but never served upon the insured.
In a recent win for policyholders, the Supreme Court of Colorado handed down a pair of decisions that extended the notice-prejudice rule to first-party property policies. Colorado law now requires an insurer to demonstrate that it was prejudiced by the insured’s late notice of a claim before it can deny coverage based on untimeliness in both property and liability policies.
