Close

Articles Posted in Conditions

Updated:

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Whether State’s Public Policy Interest Could Sink Insurance Policy’s Choice-of-Law Provision

The rare insurance dispute has appeared on the horizon for the nation’s highest court. Last month, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari and agreed to take up the case of Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC, on appeal from the Third Circuit. The key issue: whether…

Updated:

How Forum-Selection and Choice-of-Law Provisions in Insurance Policies Can Affect Coverage

Location matters. Some states are more protective of policyholder or consumer interests than others. And so, where the case is ultimately litigated, and what law applies, can have profound implications for a policyholder’s recovery. In an effort to secure the application of a body of jurisprudence they perceive to be…

Updated:

Ninth Circuit Rejects “Improper Erosion” Argument, Rejects Excess Carrier’s Refusal to Acknowledge Exhaustion of Underlying Policies

Last month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit awarded Pillsbury client Northrop Grumman a significant appellate victory, reversing an adverse decision from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on a question of first impression within the circuit. The court’s decision in AXIS Reinsurance…

Updated:

Policyholders Caught in a Reservation of Rights Catch-22 May Still Be Able to Get Out of the Bind

As coverage counsel, we witness firsthand the precarious positions policyholders are often left in due to the actions (or inactions) of their insurance carriers. A prime example of such a catch-22 scenario is when an insurer refuses to consent to a settlement offer while defending under a reservation of rights.…

Updated:

California Supreme Court Sides with Policyholder in Critical Notice-Prejudice Case

In November 2018, we noted that the California Supreme Court had agreed to resolve Pitzer College v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company, a case that hinged on the importance and application of California’s notice-prejudice rule. On August 29, 2019, the court issued its decision: a policyholder-friendly ruling that opposes technical forfeitures…

Updated:

California Supreme Court to Decide Whether Its “Notice-Prejudice” Rule Supersedes Competing Law from Other States

Before a court can resolve a dispute, it often needs to determine what law applies to that dispute. In certain insurance cases, that question will appear to have an easy answer. Some policies include explicit choice-of-law provisions indicating that they should be interpreted and applied according to the laws of a…

Updated:

Insurance Investigations 101: What You Need to Know When Your Insurer Asks Questions

A critical step in a property insurance claim is the investigation undertaken by the insurer to gather information about the claim. Insurers generally have obligations and rights to conduct a prompt investigation of claimed losses, but policyholders often do not fully understand the investigation process or coverage issues it raises.…

Updated:

Paving Over Potholes in Claims-Made Policies

As summer comes to a close, road repair crews across the country are identifying the street repairs and potholes that must be filled before the cold weather approaches. Now is also a good time for policyholders to identify some of the “potholes” that may accompany their claims-made insurance policies and…

Updated:

Are You a “You”? Don’t Ignore CGL Policies’ Separation of Insureds Clause

What a difference a word makes! Today’s words are “the,” “an,” “any,” and especially “you.” Most Commercial General Liability policies include a coverage enhancement known as a “separation of insureds” or “severability of interests” clause. This clause states that the policy’s coverage is to apply “separately” to each insured against…